I think the cover page looks awesome, but the only thing i don't really like is the type of font used for archea, and the description underneath it...But if all you guys like it, it's fine by me...i tried to change it around but it wouldn't allow me to...
I like the picture on the upper right hand corner of this page for our second page, but I like the picture that is already there as well. Is there somewhere else we can put it? http://www.ucmp.berkeley.edu/archaea/archaea.html
The group have done a nice job researching and structuring very basic material about the domain of Archaea. I hope it is clear why this group of organisms was identified as a separate domain of living organisms.
I would expect to see more on the diversity and applications of Archaea. I think that the section could be expanded and the whole presentation would benefit if you would use more recent publications along with wider variety of reviews based on introductory material to any of research publications. I have whole book on Biology and biochemistry of Archaea published in 2010.
I was happy to see some interest in Archaea due to the fact that The Genome annotation group was actually annotating genes of iron oxidising acidophile Ferroplasma acidomanus fer 1. I think you may cross reference with Genome annotation group.
Comments (14)
Qadir Muradali said
at 6:47 pm on Sep 26, 2010
Nice Picture !
BHIHAR@sgu.edu said
at 4:55 am on Oct 22, 2010
I agree
BHIHAR@sgu.edu said
at 5:05 am on Oct 22, 2010
I think the cover page looks awesome, but the only thing i don't really like is the type of font used for archea, and the description underneath it...But if all you guys like it, it's fine by me...i tried to change it around but it wouldn't allow me to...
Shanelle De Lancy said
at 11:01 pm on Oct 23, 2010
You can just remove it because its actually a picture of the font. I'm trying to find a really cool banner to put up.
SKotelnikova said
at 1:17 pm on Oct 24, 2010
I think you want to describe known molecular features of Archaea that differentiate this doemain from both Bacteria and Eukaryotae.
Saberah Abu Bakr said
at 3:22 pm on Oct 25, 2010
hey guys im trying to add the information that Dr K suggested...hopefully i can figure this out..lol
Keerat Dhatt said
at 10:53 pm on Oct 25, 2010
I like the picture on the upper right hand corner of this page for our second page, but I like the picture that is already there as well. Is there somewhere else we can put it? http://www.ucmp.berkeley.edu/archaea/archaea.html
Shanelle De Lancy said
at 1:14 am on Oct 26, 2010
Nice pic Keerat. What about the 3rd page? I think it might be suitable there.
SKotelnikova said
at 4:33 pm on Nov 15, 2010
The group have done a nice job researching and structuring very basic material about the domain of Archaea. I hope it is clear why this group of organisms was identified as a separate domain of living organisms.
I would expect to see more on the diversity and applications of Archaea. I think that the section could be expanded and the whole presentation would benefit if you would use more recent publications along with wider variety of reviews based on introductory material to any of research publications. I have whole book on Biology and biochemistry of Archaea published in 2010.
I was happy to see some interest in Archaea due to the fact that The Genome annotation group was actually annotating genes of iron oxidising acidophile Ferroplasma acidomanus fer 1. I think you may cross reference with Genome annotation group.
Bevon Babwah said
at 9:32 am on Apr 4, 2011
I like it
Amy Kalloo said
at 12:34 pm on Apr 4, 2011
I like it alsoo
Kavi Shah said
at 1:07 am on Apr 5, 2011
well organized
Leah Lousaing said
at 2:46 pm on Apr 5, 2011
Great job!
pmason said
at 7:48 am on Nov 10, 2011
Well done!
You don't have permission to comment on this page.